// DOCUMENT: FIF_PROTOCOL
NODE: AUTHORITY_WHITEPAPER
Patent 7,716,216 Compliant
US6285999B1
US9165040B1
Version 2.0

FIF Protocol
V2.0

Forensic Infrastructure Framework — the patent-compliant architecture for traffic scalability, Identity-Driven Retargeting, and ad performance that compounds with your site's authority.

// DOCUMENT_AUTHOR
Anthony James Peacock - Architect of Identity-Driven Retargeting
Anthony James Peacock
FIF Protocol V2.0 · Inventor
// PATENT_COMPLIANCE_MATRIX
NODE_01

Patent Compliance Matrix

US9165040B1
Flat Directory Structure

Eliminates deep nesting. All authority pages reside exactly 1 click from the homepage. Reduces crawl depth, concentrates PageRank, and improves Quality Score.

APPLICATION

All /strategy, /protocol, and /audit pages are served at root depth.

US6285999B1
Recursive Authority Funnel

Every sub-page programmatically includes an internal link back to the /protocol whitepaper. This concentrates PageRank into the primary authority node.

APPLICATION

All pages include a footer and inline link back to this document.

US7716216
Reasonable Surfer Model

CTAs are placed in high-probability visual zones based on eye-tracking and click-probability research. Top-right navigation and center-mass hero sections are the primary conversion zones.

APPLICATION

Book a Forensic Ad Audit CTA appears in top-right nav and center hero on every page.

// FORENSIC_FILTER
NODE_02

The Forensic Filter Protocol

V2.0.1

The Forensic Filter is the primary intake mechanism for all LinkDaddy Ads engagements. Before any campaign architecture is proposed, the target domain undergoes a 47-point infrastructure scan against the FIF Protocol V2.0 compliance matrix.

Sites that fail the scan are not accepted as clients. This is not a gatekeeping mechanism for exclusivity — it is an engineering constraint. Running paid traffic to a non-compliant infrastructure produces negative compounding returns. The ad spend amplifies the site's existing structural weaknesses.

The scan evaluates: canonical tag integrity, XML sitemap submission status, flat directory compliance (US9165040B1), internal link topology, crawl efficiency, Core Web Vitals baseline, and semantic distance between content nodes.

// METRICS
SCAN_POINTS47
PASS_THRESHOLD78%
AVG_PASS_RATE31%
PROTOCOL_VERSIONV2.0.1
// IDENTITY_RETARGETING
NODE_03

Identity-Driven Retargeting Architecture

V2.0.2

Identity-Driven Retargeting is the application of Graph Distance Optimization (US9165040B1) to audience segmentation. Rather than segmenting audiences by demographic or behavioural signals alone, we map the semantic proximity between a visitor's entry point and the site's authority nodes.

Visitors who enter through high-authority nodes (pages with strong internal link equity and topical relevance) are assigned a higher "conversion probability weight." Retargeting sequences are then calibrated to the semantic distance between the visitor's last-touched node and the primary conversion goal.

This produces retargeting audiences that are pre-qualified by architecture, not just by cookie data. The result is a structural improvement in ROAS that persists across platform algorithm changes.

// METRICS
AVG_ROAS_LIFT3.2x
AUDIENCE_SEGMENTS12
SEMANTIC_LAYERS4
PATENT_BASISUS9165040B1
// TRAFFIC_SCALABILITY
NODE_04

Patent-Compliant Traffic Scalability

V2.0.3

Traffic scalability in the FIF Protocol context refers to the ability to increase paid traffic volume without degrading conversion rates or Quality Scores. Most sites experience diminishing returns as ad spend scales because the infrastructure cannot absorb increased traffic volume without structural degradation.

The FIF Protocol solves this by treating the site's architecture as the primary scaling variable. Before increasing budget, we verify that the flat directory structure can distribute PageRank efficiently at scale, that canonical tags prevent duplicate content dilution under high-traffic conditions, and that the Reasonable Surfer UX model (US7716216) is implemented at all primary conversion points.

Scalability is therefore an architectural property, not a media buying property.

// METRICS
SCALE_FACTOR10x
QS_RETENTION94%
CANONICAL_DEPTH1-click
PATENT_BASISUS7716216
// GHOST_IDENTITY_LOGIC
NODE_05

Ghost Identity Logic — Entity Identification Over Cookies

V2.0.4

Standard retargeting relies on cookies — a fragile, consent-dependent, browser-scoped signal that expires, gets blocked, and carries zero semantic weight. LinkDaddy Ads operates on a fundamentally different layer: Entity Identification.

By mapping a user's forensic fingerprint — their entry node, content path, dwell depth, and exit vector — to the FIF Protocol's semantic graph, we construct a persistent Identity Node. This node does not expire with a cookie. It is anchored to the site's authority architecture, meaning every subsequent visit by that entity reinforces the same weighted signal regardless of browser state or consent mode.

The Ghost Identity is not a tracking mechanism. It is a structural inference: if a user enters through a high-authority node, traverses toward the conversion core, and exits without converting, the FIF Protocol assigns a residual authority weight to that session. This weight is used to calibrate the retargeting sequence — not by chasing the user with generic display ads, but by serving content that addresses the precise semantic gap between their last-touched node and the conversion goal.

The result is retargeting that feels like a continuation of the site experience, not an interruption of it.

// METRICS
IDENTITY_PERSISTENCE
COOKIE_DEPENDENCY0
SEMANTIC_LAYERS6
PATENT_BASISUS6285999B1
// PROBABILITY_WEIGHTING
NODE_06

Probability Weighting — Reasonable Surfer Ad Placement

V2.0.5

The Reasonable Surfer Model (US7716216) was developed to quantify the probability that a user will click a given link based on its visual position, contextual relevance, and surrounding signal density. LinkDaddy Ads applies this model not just to internal link architecture, but to ad placement design.

Every ad creative, landing page layout, and CTA placement is scored against a Probability Weight matrix before deployment. The matrix evaluates: position within the visual field (top-right and center-mass score highest), semantic alignment between the ad copy and the destination page's authority node, and the surfer's predicted path based on their entry vector.

This means we do not simply place ads where they are visible — we place them where the Reasonable Surfer's probability of engagement is mathematically maximised. The Forensic Ad Audit assesses your current infrastructure against this matrix and identifies the highest-probability conversion zones that are currently unoccupied or misaligned.

Probability Weighting is the mechanism by which ad spend becomes an architectural investment rather than a media cost.

// METRICS
PLACEMENT_ZONES7
TOP_ZONE_CTR_LIFT+47%
MATRIX_CHECKPOINTS23
PATENT_BASISUS7716216
// RECURSIVE_AUTHORITY_LOOPS
NODE_07

Recursive Authority Loops — Ad Clicks That Build PageRank

V2.0.6

Every ad click in a standard campaign is a one-way transaction: budget leaves, a visitor arrives, and the interaction ends. In the FIF Protocol architecture, every ad click initiates a Recursive Authority Loop.

When a paid visitor lands on a FIF-compliant page, the page's internal link structure — built to the Recursive Authority Funnel specification (US6285999B1) — automatically routes a portion of that visit's authority signal back toward the /protocol core node. This is not a manipulation of ranking signals; it is the natural consequence of a well-structured internal link topology receiving high-quality, intent-matched traffic.

The practical result: as ad spend increases, the destination pages accumulate organic authority in parallel. Quality Scores improve because the landing page relevance signal strengthens. CPCs decrease as Quality Score rises. The campaign becomes progressively more efficient the longer it runs — the opposite of the standard model, where costs increase as competition intensifies.

Recursive Authority Loops are the mechanism by which paid traffic and organic authority compound into a single, self-reinforcing system.

// METRICS
AUTHORITY_LOOP_DEPTH3
AVG_QS_GAIN+2.4
CPC_REDUCTION_90D-38%
PATENT_BASISUS6285999B1
// PROTOCOL_TERMINUS

Ready to Apply the Protocol
to Your Infrastructure?

The Forensic Ad Audit is the first step. Submit your domain for a 47-point infrastructure assessment against the FIF Protocol V2.0 compliance matrix.

// ZONE_LEGAL: PEDIGREE_DISCLOSURE
NODE_LEGAL · PATENT_COMPLIANCE_ARCHITECTURE · V2.0

Legal & Technical Pedigree:
Proprietary Compliance Architecture.

The FIF Protocol V2.0 is an independent methodology engineered by Anthony James Peacock to optimize digital infrastructure for compliance with the foundational patents governing modern search: US7716216 (Reasonable Surfer), US6285999B1 (PageRank), and US9165040B1 (Graph Distance).

PATENTTITLEASSIGNEEFIF APPLICATION
US7716216Reasonable SurferGoogle LLCUX probability weighting & CTA placement
US6285999B1PageRankGoogle LLCRecursive authority funnel architecture
US9165040B1Graph DistanceGoogle LLCFlat directory & semantic proximity mapping

"We do not own these patents;
we architect the infrastructure that survives them."

— Anthony James Peacock, Inventor · FIF Protocol V2.0

US7716216 · Compliant
US6285999B1 · Compliant
US9165040B1 · Compliant
FIF Protocol V2.0 · Active

All patent references are for compliance and educational purposes only. Patent ownership remains with the respective assignees as recorded in the USPTO database. The FIF Protocol is an independent proprietary methodology and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any patent assignee.